Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    [Dev] Feathercoin - P2Pool-Neoscrypt - Now Available

    Technical Development
    8
    88
    68273
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • lizhi
      lizhi last edited by

      Yes, same problem,why ?

      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespan = 65 after bounds
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nTargetTimespan = 60, nTargetTimespan/nActualTimespan = 0.9231
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 Before: 1e0fffff  00000fffff000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 After:  1e0fffff  00000fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 ThreadRPCServer method=validateaddress
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespan = 139 before bounds
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespanShort = 218, nActualTimespanMedium = 139, nActualTimespanLong = 145, nActualTimeSpanAvg = 167, nActualTimespan (damped) = 86
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespan = 65 after bounds
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nTargetTimespan = 60, nTargetTimespan/nActualTimespan = 0.9231
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 Before: 1e0fffff  00000fffff000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 After:  1e0fffff  00000fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 received: getheaders (37 bytes)
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 getheaders 1607 to bde747cf86ad5513cab5e9f8ace55f8ce294e77429ad8522d063e1bf4350b8b2
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 sending: headers (82 bytes)
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof-of-work verification failed
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespan = 139 before bounds
      2014-08-03 08:40:46 RETARGET: nActualTimespanShort = 218, nActualTimespanMedium = 139, nActualTimespanLong = 145, nActualTimeSpanAvg = 167, nActualTimespan (damped) = 86
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • wrapper
        wrapper Moderators last edited by

        Just some ideas to test.

        Are some of the transaction validations scrypt specific? and need updating in the code.

        Some of the p2pool settings are incorrect for the testnet, Lizhi, although you must have fixed that, to get it working at all.

        these are the wrong ports for the testnet.

        –feathercoind-p2p-port 9336 --feathercoind-rpc-port 9337

        I also had problems because there are requirements to the p2pool - rpc password, its got to have numbers and letters, of which some have to be capital letters. I don’t know if “12345” works

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ghostlander
          ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

          Disable submitblock and let it use getblocktemplate to return block data. There is also getblockex, but it seems deprecated and unsupported now.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • lizhi
            lizhi last edited by

            Thank wrapper, I think I fixed the problem.

            fix .feathercoin/feathercoin.conf

            rpcuser=ftcpool
            rpcpassword=6qXvFmctiX6pM1Bm5QPs8tEv7Th2R5HHKK
            daemon=1
            server=1
            rpcport=19337
            port=19336
            

            Miner4.jpg

            start p2pool:

            python run_p2pool.py --net feathercoin --testnet  --feathercoind-p2p-port 19336 --feathercoind-rpc-port 19337 ftcpool 6qXvFmctiX6pM1Bm5QPs8tEv7Th2R5HHKK
            

            miner command:

            minerd -o http://pool.ftc-c.com:19327 -u ftcpool -p 123 -a neoscrypt

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • lizhi
              lizhi last edited by

              A new problem. It will not work in mining three minutes later.

              after three minutes , Minerd.exe stop .

              some error information in p2pool log:

              2014-08-03 20:01:29.794448 > ---  ---
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.794660 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1039, in _inlineCallbacks
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.794859 >     result = g.send(result)
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.795101 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/web.py", line 189, in render_GET
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.795300 >     res = yield self.func(*self.args)
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.795506 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/web.py", line 194, in 
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.795714 >     web_root.putChild('rate', WebInterface(lambda: p2pool_data.get_pool_attempts_per_second(node.tracker, node.best_share_var.value, decent_height())/(1-p2pool_data.get_average_stale_prop(node.tracker, node.best_share_var.value, decent_height()))))
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.795933 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/data.py", line 547, in get_pool_attempts_per_second
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.796147 >     assert dist >= 2
              2014-08-03 20:01:29.796346 > exceptions.AssertionError: 
              2014-08-03 20:01:37.216029 P2Pool: 0 shares in chain (0 verified/0 total) Peers: 0 (0 incoming)
              2014-08-03 20:01:37.216498  Local: 1388H/s in last 10.0 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~0.3% (0-2%) Expected time to share: 48.2 minutes
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.807271 > Error in DeferredResource handler:
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.807743 > Traceback (most recent call last):
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.808046 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/util/deferred_resource.py", line 24, in render
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.808327 >     defer.maybeDeferred(resource.Resource.render, self, request).addCallbacks(finish, finish_error)
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.808621 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 134, in maybeDeferred
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.808927 >     result = f(*args, **kw)
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.809153 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/web/resource.py", line 216, in render
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.809357 >     return m(request)
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.809557 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1181, in unwindGenerator
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.809813 >     return _inlineCallbacks(None, gen, Deferred())
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.810029 > ---  ---
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.810288 >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1039, in _inlineCallbacks
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.810492 >     result = g.send(result)
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.810693 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/web.py", line 189, in render_GET
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.810938 >     res = yield self.func(*self.args)
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.811144 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/web.py", line 194, in 
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.811350 >     web_root.putChild('rate', WebInterface(lambda: p2pool_data.get_pool_attempts_per_second(node.tracker, node.best_share_var.value, decent_height())/(1-p2pool_data.get_average_stale_prop(node.tracker, node.best_share_var.value, decent_height()))))
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.811594 >   File "/data/ftcc/p2pool-neoscrypt/p2pool/data.py", line 547, in get_pool_attempts_per_second
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.811815 >     assert dist >= 2
              2014-08-03 20:01:39.812024 > exceptions.AssertionError:
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Wellenreiter
                Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                Lizhi, the errors regarding webroot.putchild are normal as long as no other p2pool node has a worker connected. It simply can’t determine the global pool hash rate.

                To give an update on my tests:

                1. neoscrypt module for p2pool installed in python with profile 0

                2. used ghostlanders neoscrypt p2pool as basis and added the feathercoin infos in networks.py and bitcoin/networks.py

                3. forced the pool to use getblocktemplate, as suggested by ghostlander

                4. current log shows:

                  2014-08-05 19:06:05.383892 Worker mrKP5thmnTRxV2Em8x3d8pamPXWHtv2Ed submitted share with hash > target:
                  2014-08-05 19:06:05.384129 Hash:   67146109f860500455e07f9c06a298ec2bd85202c42c18bd0bd63bf0cb059a5e
                  2014-08-05 19:06:05.384219 Target: a6c64b37894160e5d022dbf97e6abc74931804560e2db29defa7c64b378941

                5. implemented reversebyte to change from big endian to little endian for target.

                this changes the target, but as the Pow_hash has 2 bytes more than the target, it is always bigger than the target.

                I noticed, that Ghoslander has aa pcx p2pool running on his testnet, which is on neoscrypt, so I send him a message to ask what he has modified to get it running.

                Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Wellenreiter
                  Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                  new commit on github, including reversebyte.py, which was missing.

                  Still not working

                  Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                  Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrapper
                    wrapper Moderators last edited by

                    Great work guys!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • lizhi
                      lizhi last edited by

                      oh, it not work :-

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Wellenreiter
                        Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                        I spend half a day on the p2pool stuff again
                        no results
                        what I noticed is, that the p2pool neoscrypt module produces wrong results while the same code runs fine in the wallet, so it may be ‘just’ a problem of function calls and parameter transfer between python and C++.

                        also if I read it right, the Wallet code passes variables to the neoscrypt procedure, as in GetPowHash() in main.h, while the python passes pointer to structures??

                        Eample from wallet main.h:

                        /* Calculates block proof-of-work hash using either NeoScrypt or Scrypt */
                        uint256 GetPoWHash() const {
                        unsigned int profile = 0x0;
                        uint256 hash;
                        
                        /* All blocks generated up to this time point are Scrypt only */
                        if((fTestNet && (nTime < nTestnetSwitchV2)) ||
                        (!fTestNet && (nTime < nSwitchV2))) {
                        profile = 0x3;
                        } else {
                        /* All these blocks must be v2+ with valid nHeight */
                        int nHeight = GetBlockHeight();
                        if(fTestNet) {
                        if(nHeight < nTestnetFork)
                        profile = 0x3;
                        } else {
                        if(nHeight < nForkFour)
                        profile = 0x3;
                        }
                        }
                        
                        neoscrypt((unsigned char *) &nVersion, (unsigned char *) &hash, profile);
                        
                        return hash;
                        } 
                        

                        Example from p2pool/work.py:

                         
                        pow_hash = self.node.net.PARENT.POW_FUNC(bitcoin_data.block_header_type.pack(header))
                        

                        Where header is a dict in python.

                        Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                        Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • U
                          uncle_muddy administrators last edited by

                          Wellen,

                          I’m at the same point as you now :(

                          I get everything looking like it’s running well but nothing is accepted by the wallet, I’ll keep pluggin away but I’m some what in the dark here as my coding skills are limited in this area :(

                          UM

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Wellenreiter
                            Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                            The miner says ’ hash accepted’ , but in the p2pool log you will see entries like ‘worker xyz submitted share with hash > target’

                            Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                            Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • lizhi
                              lizhi last edited by

                              I spend half a day on the p2pool stuff again
                              no results
                              what I noticed is, that the p2pool neoscrypt module produces wrong results while the same code runs fine in the wallet, so it may be ‘just’ a problem of function calls and parameter transfer between python and C++.

                              also if I read it right, the Wallet code passes variables to the neoscrypt procedure, as in GetPowHash() in main.h, while the python passes pointer to structures??

                              Eample from wallet main.h:

                              /* Calculates block proof-of-work hash using either NeoScrypt or Scrypt */
                              uint256 GetPoWHash() const {
                              unsigned int profile = 0x0;
                              uint256 hash;
                              
                              /* All blocks generated up to this time point are Scrypt only */
                              if((fTestNet && (nTime < nTestnetSwitchV2)) ||
                              (!fTestNet && (nTime < nSwitchV2))) {
                              profile = 0x3;
                              } else {
                              /* All these blocks must be v2+ with valid nHeight */
                              int nHeight = GetBlockHeight();
                              if(fTestNet) {
                              if(nHeight < nTestnetFork)
                              profile = 0x3;
                              } else {
                              if(nHeight < nForkFour)
                              profile = 0x3;
                              }
                              }
                              
                              neoscrypt((unsigned char *) &nVersion, (unsigned char *) &hash, profile);
                              
                              return hash;
                              } 
                              

                              Example from p2pool/work.py:

                               
                              pow_hash = self.node.net.PARENT.POW_FUNC(bitcoin_data.block_header_type.pack(header))
                              

                              Where header is a dict in python.

                              I think it is in main.py.

                              if share.pow_hash
                              
                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Wellenreiter
                                Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                                For testing I temporarily modified the neoscrypt.c of the p2pool neoscrypt module and defined the input value of the hashing procedure as constant in the c-code. It seems to calculate correctly.

                                Also the target on p2pool measured against seems to be fine.

                                I assume, that the return value from the neoscrypt module either has an overflow or is interpreted wrong. may be wrong type, little/big endian problem or whatever.

                                ------------- Edit---------------

                                Checked type of pow_hash and target in work.py -> both variables have type ‘long’

                                Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                                Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • ghostlander
                                  ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                                  If you switch CPUminer in debug mode with -D, you can see P2Pool asking for incorrect targets:

                                  [2014-08-10 21:21:12] 1 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
                                  [2014-08-10 21:21:15] Long-polling activated for http://prometheus.phoenixcoin.org:20554/long-polling
                                  [2014-08-10 21:21:15] DEBUG: got new work in 3062 ms
                                  [2014-08-10 21:21:16] DEBUG (little endian): hash
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • Wellenreiter
                                    Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                                    It is working now for long-poll.

                                    No support for stratum at the moment, even if work is distributed, no valid blocks can be mined via stratum.

                                    A new version is on github

                                    Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                                    Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • lizhi
                                      lizhi last edited by

                                      Yes, It work! >:D

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • wrapper
                                        wrapper Moderators last edited by

                                        neoscrypt p2pool dev testing cpu mine phoenixcoin

                                        http://95.85.57.10:10554

                                        Longpoll works, so start minerd with ‘–no-stratum’

                                        useing Ghostlander’s Github (for minerd)

                                        https://github.com/g…r-neoscrypt.git

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • lizhi
                                          lizhi last edited by

                                          Latest code pushed

                                          git clone git://github.com/wellenreiter01/p2pool-neoscrypt

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • wrapper
                                            wrapper Moderators last edited by

                                            What is the status of the p2pool?

                                            Is there still a problem with stratum?

                                            Are we near to pushing some changes upstream? How far back can that go?

                                            That makes things easier running multicoin p2pools. That will mean the “central p2pool” distribution gets updated.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post