Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    Feathercoin daemon and wallet production version 0.19.1
    Old daemon and wallet version 0.18.3

    [Dev] Packaging feathercoind and feathercoin-qt on Linux

    Technical Development
    linux feathercoin release
    6
    45
    35610
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wrapper
      wrapper Moderators last edited by wrapper

      I am trying to learn about the OpenSuse build service and who owns what and what is where. Pretty mind blowing.

      I noted that : the 9.3.1 build is complex because of bringing in and compiling associated dependencies.

      1. Does this work with the straight 16.04 dev install, without compiling outside dependencies?. (probably not in case of zxing)

      2. If not, it is OpenSuse suggested policy to build (such as zxing or BerkleyDB) as separate repositories, so others could use them and bring the binaries in from there (on the final “release” build). I have searched and no zxing is currently up.

      3. I have registered Feathercoin-qt Opensuse build service name, for consideration as the official name, can pass it over appropriately.

      4. I have researched becoming the Offical FTC openSuse package and have been given and possible way forward, to be assesd by the Factory as the official package. Passed on to Wellenreiter try that angle.

      Wellenreiter 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Wellenreiter
        Wellenreiter Moderators @wrapper last edited by

        @wrapper said:

        I am trying to learn about the OpenSuse build service and who owns what and what is where. Pretty mind blowing.

        I noted that : the 9.3.1 build is complex because of bringing in and compiling associated dependencies.

        1. Does this work with the straight 16.04 dev install, without compiling outside dependencies?. (probably not in case of zxing)

        If you follow the guide I made for debian/ubuntu installs it should solve all dependencies, as you add my repository as package source and I’ve a xzing package for ubuntu there.

        1. If not, it is OpenSuse suggested policy to build (such as zxing or BerkleyDB) as separate repositories, so others could use them and bring the binaries in from there (on the final “release” build). I have searched and no zxing is currently up.

        The package name is ‘libzxing’ ;)

        1. I have registered Feathercoin-qt Opensuse build service name, for consideration as the official name, can pass it over appropriately.

        2. I have researched becoming the Offical FTC openSuse package and have been given and possible way forward, to be assesd by the Factory as the official package. Passed on to Wellenreiter try that angle.

        Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
        Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • AcidD
          AcidD Moderators last edited by AcidD

          Random idea semi related. Now that Ubuntu builds have been done… maybe posting that on bitcointalk just to make people aware.

          Ubuntu is a popular distro, makes sense no ?

          • FTC Block Explorer + API @ https://fsight.chain.tips
          • FTC Beer Money: 6x4LEQV88zRnBvZoH6ZNK6SeRxx4KiTyJs
          • FTC bech32 address: fc1q4tclm3cv4v86ez6el76ewmharexfapxhek5a03
          • BTC bech32 address: bc1qk8umuccapuafspk9e5szahvp0detafuzugv4ay

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • wrapper
            wrapper Moderators last edited by

            @Aciddude Re : To Announce all the builds available — That’s a great idea.

            I would look better if we get all the links sorted so we/Wellenreiter are the official builds on OpenSuse.

            There is a procedure, hopefully short, to apply to the Factory project maintainer. It would look better, especially announcing it.

            I suppose the author could specify each of the "official " builds in a link - and go back later and update them if we end up adjusting the links to release builds.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • wrapper
              wrapper Moderators last edited by

              I have been investigating the usefulness of “cheap” Arm smart TV boxes. As905 quad core Arm is quite powerful, enough to start running a full desktop. It currently runs Android.

              It is relatively straight forward to compile the Bitcoin codebase for Arm 7 and above should have enough power to run graphics.

              I am looking into wither a build service covers cross compiling a Arm build?

              https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1386368.0

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post