[Retracted !!! ] Smart contracts - bounty No.3 thread - 4BTC

mirrax

I just notice this from the “Troll Box” – weirdly

https://twitter.com/factomproject

Factom
@factomproject

Factom is a system for securing millions of realtime records in the blockchain with a single hash

Factom is interesting project.
I like it a lot.

http://symbiont.io/uncategorized/smart-contract-vs-token-based-systems/
another one project like tether https://www.bitt.com/

mirrax

if you start digging into http://www.omnilayer.org/ it turns out to be pretty interesting project!

wrapper

Reading some of the OmniWallet blurb on Github, the idea is to have altcoins / multicoin wallet anyway : Interesting development I think… :).

https://github.com/OmniLayer/omniwallet

What is Omniwallet?

Omniwallet is a new type of web wallet, that combines security, ease of use, multi-currency support, and is completely open source from the ground up (even including the deployment scripts)

It currently supports Bitcoin and Mastercoin, and will support Mastercoin-derived currency in the future. In addition, support for other blockchains is a high priority for us - you will be able to store Litecoins, Peercoins, and other alts on the same highly secure web wallet (See running bounty for Peercoin integration).

For more information see the Omniwallet announcement.

You can access the beta site at https://www.omniwallet.org

https://tether.to/faqs/
Tethers exist on the Bitcoin blockchain through the Omni Protocol. The Omni Protocol is open source software that interfaces with the Bitcoin blockchain to allow for the issuance and redemption of cryptocurrency tokens, in our case, “tethers”.

https://medium.com/@DJohnstonEC/the-battle-for-merchants-is-over-the-war-for-consumers-is-just-beginning-3630a2e933be#.5qlqfzstq

zerodrama

cough link cough
@mirrax

mirrax

@zerodrama said:

cough link cough
@mirrax

what’s up with that?

slavco

If Feathercoin follows the Bitcoin development ( Core a this case ), Segregated Witness is what will make Bitcoin blockchain Turing complete e.g. will support smart contracts same as ETH…

https://twitter.com/cnLedger/status/700997980527022080

zerodrama

Factom is a prettier version of Link
@mirrax

mirrax

@zerodrama said:

Factom is a prettier version of Link
@mirrax

prettier AND commercially successful

zerodrama

Also Orwellian.
@mirrax

wrapper

I see there is a problem with Linux Mint being hacked. The hackers were able to insert their own “iso” by diverting to another IP to one with a trojan. Some people picked up the md5 was different, but there is no place to actually record which is the official correct one, externally.

There has been a lot of discussion on how “md5” files could be secured / checked , as one way help prevent this sort of problem.

Even a small bounty / donation could allow open source projects to record “md5” of official release of projects, at a min fee, for a lot of projects.

This could be FTC first open contract / open proof use of the blockchain.

http://techxplore.com/news/2016-02-linux-mint-downloads-february-sweet.html

mirrax

@wrapper said:

I see there is a problem with Linux Mint being hacked. The hackers were able to insert their own “iso” by diverting to another IP to one with a trojan. Some people picked up the md5 was different, but there is no place to actually record which is the official correct one, externally.

There has been a lot of discussion on how “md5” files could be secured / checked , as one way help prevent this sort of problem.

Even a small bounty / donation could allow open source projects to record “md5” of official release of projects, at a min fee, for a lot of projects.

This could be FTC first open contract / open proof use of the blockchain.

Thanks for bringing practical example to the table.

mirrax

@mirrax

FYI email from omni devs:

Hey Guys,

Omni is essentially blockchain agnostic. We currently leverage the Bitcoin network as a transport and use its input signing model to provide the security for Omni transactions, but nothing restricts us to doing this only on Bitcoin.

Since Litecoin (and Feathercoin) are forked from Bitcoin Core’s codebase and use the same input/output modelling, a port of Omni would be very easy. Essentially Litecoin/Feathercoin change the proof-of-work component, but this isn’t the component that Omni leverages so the underlying PoW mechanism is largely irrelevant for Omni.

@Craig - in a nutshell think about the resources we devote to a major branch change of our underlying Bitcoin Core stack (eg 0.9 to 0.10) and that is probably the level of work required to adopt an alternate chain.

It’s important to note however that Omni on a different chain would be an independent Omni state to that of Omni on Bitcoin (atomic cross chain swaps would be a killer app, but we’d need to do some thinking there). Also WRT to Litecoin, Charlie has already made his position clear on projects that embed data in the blockchain, so I think Litecoin would be a less than ideal target - we don’t want conflict - we want engagement, and I don’t think we’ll get that from the Litecoin development team.

Thanks
Z

ghostlander

If the Omni developers are interested, I’m ready to co-operate. We can do what BTC or LTC don’t want to.

mirrax

@ghostlander muddy hold the funds for this bounty now

ChekaZ

bump

any updates? - Whats with the bounty?

Kindly regards,
ChekaZ

AcidD

@ChekaZ said in Smart contracts - bounty No.3 thread - 4BTC:

bump

any updates? - Whats with the bounty?

Kindly regards,
ChekaZ

@uncle_muddy is holding the funds and as far as I know from reading and being around during all these bounty’s…the Bounty is still active!

Wellenreiter

***UPDATE !!! !!! !!! ***

As nobody has claimed the bounty or indicated interest to work for it, the bounty is closed now.

It may be re-opened in the the future.

jimmy24651

…I’m so confused…