Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    Project or just idea?

    Projects
    9
    28
    13274
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jeremiel Regular Member last edited by

      Well, someone asked for suggestions on Feathercoin new features. A lot of the stuff looks like UI design choices. I added this to the mix which is would be something to interact with a browser…

      This goes off of ChristianRiesen’s suggestion…

      donation reference link aka drl
      coin-ftc://6y2x6dZNuxrnNBNHmwjxZm63CBthWKZHp1/10.1234

      I’d rather put the coin-ftc in the front instead of just ftc. Don’t want the federal trade commission to come after us…LOL That and it dictates the url usage. So in the future it could also be coin-btc but either way the only thing I really care about is that someone can click on a link at a site to bring up a 2 to 3 click transfer of funds.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        groll Regular Member last edited by

        for the one that want the direct wallet it seems that the protocol will need to be registered to be include like the bitcoin, yes bitcoin is

        usual way to start app is via a protocolhandler registration

        [quote]scheme (registerProtocolHandler() only)

        A scheme, such as mailto or web+auth. The scheme must be compared in an ASCII case-insensitive manner by user agents for the purposes of comparing with the scheme part of URLs that they consider against the list of registered handlers.

        The scheme value, if it contains a colon (as in “mailto:”), will never match anything, since schemes don’t contain colons.

        If the registerProtocolHandler() method is invoked with a scheme that is neither a whitelisted scheme nor a scheme whose value starts with the substring “web+” and otherwise contains only lowercase ASCII letters, and whose length is at least five characters (including the “web+” prefix), the user agent must throw a SecurityError exception.

        The following schemes are the whitelisted schemes:

        bitcoin
        irc
        geo
        mailto
        magnet
        mms
        news
        nntp
        sip
        sms
        smsto
        ssh
        tel
        urn
        webcal
        xmpp
        [/quote]

        other technics can be used but will be a bit less clean, like registering a content type (like opening a document)

        I will look at what else is possible in another 20H from now

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Kevlar Spammer last edited by

          Didn’t Mike Hern just get bitcoin: url handler standardized? Let me look…

          Yep. He did. It’s part of the HTM5 spec. https://plus.google.com/100132233764003563318/posts/CDnMpM9iV74

          Let’s NOT reinvent the wheel here. There’s already a specification for doing EXACTLY this here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/URI_Scheme

          Furthermore, since bitcoin: is whitelisted in HTML5, you may want to consider extending the existing specification rather than supporting a parallel one. Although that’s a problem since the most likely registered handler of bitcoin: is going to be the bitcoin client.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U
            UKMark last edited by

            [quote name=“Kevlar” post=“5231” timestamp=“1369200995”]
            Didn’t Mike Hern just get bitcoin: url handler standardized? Let me look…

            Yep. He did. It’s part of the HTM5 spec. https://plus.google.com/100132233764003563318/posts/CDnMpM9iV74

            Let’s NOT reinvent the wheel here. There’s already a specification for doing EXACTLY this here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/URI_Scheme

            Furthermore, since bitcoin: is whitelisted in HTML5, you may want to consider extending the existing specification rather than supporting a parallel one. Although that’s a problem since the most likely registered handler of bitcoin: is going to be the bitcoin client.
            [/quote]

            Yup I keep saying it; HTML5 for FTW :)

            [code]bitcoin:1Lga7x6ttEbqNaFMatLrnVkXad4BmBznKv [/code]

            ^Copy and paste my address above into an HTML5 compatible browser and it will ask for an application to be opened, I use multibit (still my favourite client) - any amount of BTC will do :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • U
              UKMark last edited by

              This is where [i]we need [/i]to be looking…

              http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/

              http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/Main_Page

              https://payswarm.com/specs/source/web-commerce/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                justabitoftime last edited by

                [quote name=“UKMark” post=“5588” timestamp=“1369264315”]
                This is where [i]we need [/i]to be looking…

                http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/

                http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/Main_Page

                https://payswarm.com/specs/source/web-commerce/
                [/quote]

                I agree!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • U
                  UKMark last edited by

                  Bump! :)

                  [quote][b]Why choose MultiBit ?

                  MultiBit is:

                  Quick and easy to install across all major desktop operating systems (Windows, Mac, Linux)
                  Secure by design - all private keys are kept encrypted on your local machine (or on a USB stick)
                  Faster to synchronize - usually a minute or so
                  Lighter - the stored data is much smaller (usually a few megabytes)
                  Flexible - multiple wallets allow for a “current account”, “savings account”, “expenses” etc
                  International - multiple languages (25+ at the last release)

                  If you are an ordinary user of Bitcoin and simply want a wallet that just works without hassle, then MultiBit is the right choice for you.[/b][/quote]

                  ^^ I would really like our client to take a leaf or two out of multibit’s book!

                  Also

                  I am prepared to develop/assist in HTML5 plugins/code snippets if we can get this url protocol off the ground, I am just unsure how we go about gaining the Feathercoin:Addresshere protocol accepted into the next HTML5 WC3 spec (maybe justabit or bush can advise me on this?)…Once this can be done, FTC growth will be seen, I promise!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jeremiel Regular Member last edited by

                    [quote name=“UKMark” post=“5975” timestamp=“1369391052”]
                    Bump! :)

                    [quote][b]Why choose MultiBit ?

                    MultiBit is:

                    Quick and easy to install across all major desktop operating systems (Windows, Mac, Linux)
                    Secure by design - all private keys are kept encrypted on your local machine (or on a USB stick)
                    Faster to synchronize - usually a minute or so
                    Lighter - the stored data is much smaller (usually a few megabytes)
                    Flexible - multiple wallets allow for a “current account”, “savings account”, “expenses” etc
                    International - multiple languages (25+ at the last release)

                    If you are an ordinary user of Bitcoin and simply want a wallet that just works without hassle, then MultiBit is the right choice for you.[/b][/quote]

                    ^^ I would really like our client to take a leaf or two out of multibit’s book!

                    Also

                    I am prepared to develop/assist in HTML5 plugins/code snippets if we can get this url protocol off the ground, I am just unsure how we go about gaining the Feathercoin:Addresshere protocol accepted into the next HTML5 WC3 spec (maybe justabit or bush can advise me on this?)…Once this can be done, FTC growth will be seen, I promise!
                    [/quote]

                    Gonna sound ignorant but why can’t we just try this…

                    uhhh yeah baby…
                    uhhh yeah baby…

                    And then make sure the client can read it. submit it for approval afterwards. I know a few unregistered uri’s that work with programs just the programs have to know what the format is and of course that could change…

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • U
                      UKMark last edited by

                      [quote name=“jeremiel” post=“6113” timestamp=“1369420532”]
                      [quote author=UKMark link=topic=512.msg5975#msg5975 date=1369391052]
                      Bump! :)

                      [quote][b]Why choose MultiBit ?

                      MultiBit is:

                      Quick and easy to install across all major desktop operating systems (Windows, Mac, Linux)
                      Secure by design - all private keys are kept encrypted on your local machine (or on a USB stick)
                      Faster to synchronize - usually a minute or so
                      Lighter - the stored data is much smaller (usually a few megabytes)
                      Flexible - multiple wallets allow for a “current account”, “savings account”, “expenses” etc
                      International - multiple languages (25+ at the last release)

                      If you are an ordinary user of Bitcoin and simply want a wallet that just works without hassle, then MultiBit is the right choice for you.[/b][/quote]

                      ^^ I would really like our client to take a leaf or two out of multibit’s book!

                      Also

                      I am prepared to develop/assist in HTML5 plugins/code snippets if we can get this url protocol off the ground, I am just unsure how we go about gaining the Feathercoin:Addresshere protocol accepted into the next HTML5 WC3 spec (maybe justabit or bush can advise me on this?)…Once this can be done, FTC growth will be seen, I promise!
                      [/quote]

                      Gonna sound ignorant but why can’t we just try this…

                      uhhh yeah baby…
                      uhhh yeah baby…

                      And then make sure the client can read it. submit it for approval afterwards. I know a few unregistered uri’s that work with programs just the programs have to know what the format is and of course that could change…
                      [/quote]

                      No not at all, that is not ignorant, it is extremely valid!

                      I have mentioned this already to bush about building this in to the client, I totally agree, if we want an easy path forward then this is it. 8)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Bushstar
                        Bushstar last edited by

                        Great idea. I’ve now this on my increasing list of things to look into tomorrow. Keep doing research on this and I’ll get up to speed in the morning.

                        Donate: 6hf9DF8H67ZEoW9KmPJez6BHh4XPNQSCZz

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • U
                          UKMark last edited by

                          [quote name=“Bushstar” post=“6223” timestamp=“1369432888”]
                          Great idea. I’ve now this on my increasing list of things to look into tomorrow. Keep doing research on this and I’ll get up to speed in the morning.
                          [/quote]

                          Will do and thanks bush, I know you are extremely busy! 8)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Bushstar
                            Bushstar last edited by

                            [quote name=“UKMark” post=“6234” timestamp=“1369433367”]
                            [quote author=Bushstar link=topic=512.msg6223#msg6223 date=1369432888]
                            Great idea. I’ve now this on my increasing list of things to look into tomorrow. Keep doing research on this and I’ll get up to speed in the morning.
                            [/quote]

                            Will do and thanks bush, I know you are extremely busy! 8)
                            [/quote]

                            I figured I would be busy but I never knew how busy. Yesterday I actually took a break and went to Tescos with my wife :)

                            Donate: 6hf9DF8H67ZEoW9KmPJez6BHh4XPNQSCZz

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • U
                              UKMark last edited by

                              [quote name=“Bushstar” post=“6345” timestamp=“1369488251”]
                              [quote author=UKMark link=topic=512.msg6234#msg6234 date=1369433367]
                              [quote author=Bushstar link=topic=512.msg6223#msg6223 date=1369432888]
                              Great idea. I’ve now this on my increasing list of things to look into tomorrow. Keep doing research on this and I’ll get up to speed in the morning.
                              [/quote]

                              Will do and thanks bush, I know you are extremely busy! 8)
                              [/quote]

                              I figured I would be busy but I never knew how busy. Yesterday I actually took a break and went to Tescos with my wife :)
                              [/quote]

                              :)
                              Imagine the day when you go to Tesco’s and pay with FTC ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • U
                                UKMark last edited by

                                Update on this idea can be found here: http://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?topic=924.0

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post