Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    Is SHA-256 bad because of the NSA?

    Feathercoin Discussion
    6
    8
    2615
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      Radacoin last edited by

      “[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha-256]SHA-2[/url] is a set of cryptographic hash functions (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512) designed by the U.S. National Security Agency ([b]NSA[/b]) …”
      Bitcoin uses SHA-256.
      Litecoin used Scrypt.

      Should we use this as an argument to prefer Feathercoin over Bitcoin?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Smoothie Regular Member last edited by

        (shrug) in my opinion it isnt a problem.

        Not for us at least.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Kevlar Spammer last edited by

          [quote name=“Radacoin” post=“15620” timestamp=“1371372051”]
          “[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha-256]SHA-2[/url] is a set of cryptographic hash functions (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512) designed by the U.S. National Security Agency ([b]NSA[/b]) …”
          Bitcoin uses SHA-256.
          Litecoin used Scrypt.

          Should we use this as an argument to prefer Feathercoin over Bitcoin?
          [/quote]

          No, because it’s in the public domain, which means there’s no royalties. A hashing function has it’s own set of parameters it should be judged by… the governing body who declares it a standard not being one of those parameters.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • zerodrama
            zerodrama Regular Member last edited by

            [quote name=“Kevlar” post=“15823” timestamp=“1371433451”]
            [quote author=Radacoin link=topic=1937.msg15620#msg15620 date=1371372051]
            “[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha-256]SHA-2[/url] is a set of cryptographic hash functions (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512) designed by the U.S. National Security Agency ([b]NSA[/b]) …”
            Bitcoin uses SHA-256.
            Litecoin used Scrypt.

            Should we use this as an argument to prefer Feathercoin over Bitcoin?
            [/quote]

            No, because it’s in the public domain, which means there’s no royalties. A hashing function has it’s own set of parameters it should be judged by… the governing body who declares it a standard not being one of those parameters.
            [/quote]

            I think the issue is more of intent rather than capability.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Smoothie Regular Member last edited by

              [quote name=“d2” post=“15626” timestamp=“1371372648”]
              [quote author=Smoothie link=topic=1937.msg15624#msg15624 date=1371372530]
              (shrug) in my opinion it isnt a problem.

              Not for us at least.
              [/quote]

              Until they fund a $40 billion covert mining project to steal all the coins!
              [/quote]

              Solution:

              1. Change hash algorithm

              2. In the meantime instill checkpointing to give them the virtual middle finger. =)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                Mogumodz last edited by

                NSA are some of the best friends you never knew you had ;)

                http://anony.ws/i/2013/06/17/T52ms.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  justabitoftime last edited by

                  [quote name=“Mogumodz” post=“15929” timestamp=“1371481933”]
                  NSA are some of the best friends you never knew you had ;)

                  http://anony.ws/i/2013/06/17/T52ms.jpg
                  [/quote]

                  hahahaha

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    Radacoin last edited by

                    [quote name=“zerodrama” post=“15894” timestamp=“1371462085”]
                    I think the issue is more of intent rather than capability.
                    [/quote]

                    Definitely!

                    I picture some of the NSA guys, sitting in their ivory tower, watching down on Bitcointalk forum and having a ball. One day, when Bitcoin would become a serious thread, they register a newbie account, and their first posting are just 3 lines of code: Code that allows everybody to break the SHA-256 algorithm. ;)

                    Edit: Wanted to share this (must see!): Obama in 2007: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3Iht7JNwE&t=0m18s

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post