Feathercoin 0.8.5 Client

Bushstar

[quote name=“lizhi” post=“40087” timestamp=“1386253790”]
Complete zh_CN.patch . I revised several errors and make sentences more fluent.
[/quote]

Thanks for looking through it. There was a fair bit of content to go through by the looks of it. I have now compiled this into the client. Please give it a spin and check out your translations.

https://downloads.feathercoin.com/feathercoin-0.8.5-beta3-CN.zip

Bushstar

I think that we are ready to release. We can update translations that have not already been migrated if and when they get done after the release. The new release fixes many bugs that people are currently suffering from, especially the synchronisation error when first loading the blockchain.

kris_davison

Thats great news did you say there was going to be some compatibility issues with the old version?

Bushstar

There is a BDB lock limit rule change on 31 January 2014 at 00:00 which is the point when we need everyone upgraded for compatibility. There is plenty of time before then and we are stable so we can leave this as it is in the code.

Wellenreiter

[quote name=“Bushstar” post=“40502” timestamp=“1386328345”]
I think that we are ready to release. We can update translations that have not already been migrated if and when they get done after the release. The new release fixes many bugs that people are currently suffering from, especially the synchronisation error when first loading the blockchain.
[/quote]

For the release, we can link the package depot to the main page, as you suggested before.

Just give me a heads up, so I can pull the last revision about a day before the release message get’s out and start the packaging process

wrapper

I agree with Bush. It is deployed upstream, and tests OK so far.

Release the beta as - RC1, and all be ready to fix and test anything that gets reported, using “extreme programming” techniques.

We could look to include translations, etc, in RC2.

If we plan and announce those releases in advance, then everyone could be ready to assist.

Bushstar

[quote name=“Wellenreiter” post=“40679” timestamp=“1386359283”]
For the release, we can link the package depot to the main page, as you suggested before.

Just give me a heads up, so I can pull the last revision about a day before the release message get’s out and start the packaging process
[/quote]

Can you please go ahead and pull the latest version?

We should release this as Wrapper suggests as RC1.

lizhi

[quote name=“Bushstar” post=“40125” timestamp=“1386258839”]
[quote author=lizhi link=topic=4885.msg40087#msg40087 date=1386253790]
Complete zh_CN.patch . I revised several errors and make sentences more fluent.
[/quote]

Thanks for looking through it. There was a fair bit of content to go through by the looks of it. I have now compiled this into the client. Please give it a spin and check out your translations.

https://downloads.feathercoin.com/feathercoin-0.8.5-beta3-CN.zip
[/quote]

Well, It’s fine. :)

wrapper

ACK, will get back on more tests.

Wellenreiter

[quote name=“Bushstar” post=“40992” timestamp=“1386402498”]
[quote author=Wellenreiter link=topic=4885.msg40679#msg40679 date=1386359283]
For the release, we can link the package depot to the main page, as you suggested before.

Just give me a heads up, so I can pull the last revision about a day before the release message get’s out and start the packaging process
[/quote]

Can you please go ahead and pull the latest version?

We should release this as Wrapper suggests as RC1.
[/quote]

Done.

It shows as version 0.8.5.0_rc1 on [url=http://software.opensuse.org/package/feathercoin]http://software.opensuse.org/package/feathercoin[/url]

By the way, the new splash screen looks great :)

wrapper

Sanity check, Beta3

Compiled Linux 13.10,
tested translations,
general test + adjust settings.
Press all buttons.
Mouse over descriptions.
Debug log, getpeerinfo, no errors noted.
sync with network

>>>>>>>>>>

New splash screen is Mint. Looks great.

I’ll do 13.04 32 bit compile as well next, just in case.

Bushstar

[quote name=“iawgoM” post=“41538” timestamp=“1386493709”]
[quote author=wrapper0feather link=topic=4885.msg41291#msg41291 date=1386444813]
New splash screen is Mint. Looks great.
[/quote]

Well, thank you ::)
[/quote]

Kudos to iawgoM, thanks for the new splash screen :)

Bushstar

I have now linked in all RC1 releases into the first post of this thread. I’m thinking that these should be linked into the front page as the main downloads with links to the old build below. Do this sound sane?

ftcMagic

I’ve built it on my Archlinux box from GIT and have been using it constantly as my main wallet. It receives just fine from the pool I use, it sends just fine to BTC-e. All buttons work; I’ve encountered no crashes. I haven’t used the RCP console, and I haven’t tried solo mining with it. Other than that, what needs to be checked before release?

wrapper

I have a Blockchain database update issue, possibly due to Qt5 compile.

Will take a few hours to recompile and test import wallet to Virtual box wallet.

Fields are aligned to wrong fields in Recieve database. After update 0.6.4.4 to 0.8.5 RC1

Tried -reindex and -rescan (no change).

Still advise caution updating to new 0.8.5. client, unless in clean test environment. Always back up wallet anyway.

Wellenreiter

I’m using qt4 and haven’t noticed any problem.
How does the problem show up?

keep me updated.

Bushstar

Wrapper, have you been able to recreate the blockchain DB corruption?

What kind of error message did you get on launch? This may be a well documented quirk :)

Wellenreiter, I have seen your fix for Debian on GitHub and will give it a spin tomorrow.

Wellenreiter

simply added a close button to the qrcode window. beneficial for all versions I think ;)

wrapper

[quote name=“Bushstar” post=“43526” timestamp=“1386873903”]
Wrapper, have you been able to recreate the blockchain DB corruption?

What kind of error message did you get on launch? This may be a well documented quirk :)
[/quote]

Still got 0.8.5 upgrade / restore back up -receive fields description mismatch.

I’ve reproduced some upgraded wallets and also cut down Debug.log file for the upgrade period.

I’ve checked but not seen any similar fault, too busy could be wrong. Let me know if Maintenance Task identified…

Is it because mining had no Address label? so the all addresse field content dropped down one? In my case address Bit-messa**** being first in the index. Which is why it is the new mining label?

I’ll look at data structures and get back.

wrapper

I can’t find why my receive address got mismatched after update, yet. We need a workaround whatever. May be a coincidence but got this in Debug.log.

AddToWallet 261d5a88ba8a9b56c3b85fae9c42f2301c942e4c649117df414fe234b63984c2
AddToWallet 390a6f0d0abd8cba8218af790047833576a23363ae1bc6c11856970f7ac8834a
ERROR: bool CBlock::ReadFromDisk(const CDiskBlockPos&)() : deserialize or I/O error
ERROR: bool CBlock::ReadFromDisk(const CDiskBlockPos&)() : deserialize or I/O error
ERROR: bool CBlock::ReadFromDisk(const CDiskBlockPos&)() : deserialize or I/O error
-rescan

See below my mining has a “bit-message label”. the 6i1BPX is my mining receive.

Field description mismatch. I only just updated my real system, so that should be clean of tests.

This is the line in main.cpp that adds the receive address to the wallet on a rescan.

>>>>>
// make sure all wallets know about the given transaction, in the given block
void SyncWithWallets(const uint256 &hash, const CTransaction& tx, const CBlock* pblock, bool fUpdate)
{
BOOST_FOREACH(CWallet* pwallet, setpwalletRegistered)
pwallet->AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe(hash, tx, pblock, fUpdate);

[attachment deleted by admin]