FTC p2pool public node list
-
I can put in some static reverse lookups, if you wish. Any wishes? Yours (Prensel, the dutch one?) does not seem to be looked up correctly for example!?
-
best would be to modify the p2pool-api and include the local hostname there.
the $_server variable could probablay be used for that.
any customization of the node scanner can solve the problem for a given server only.see: [url=http://php.net/manual/de/reserved.variables.server.php]http://php.net/manual/de/reserved.variables.server.php[/url]
-
p2pool is python which is not my most liked language… ;-)
For now i have made the reverse lookup a bit less strict. However, it will then also do reverse lookups for hosts which have no forward DNS entry (like debbie.reho.nl). I may revert that change as you cannot reach the p2pool via the name in that case.
As long as i think about it, i have also added the link to the IP address to the p2pools list.
Regards,
MrSheep -
ftcpool.nl is vhosted on debbie.reho.nl
-
@prensel: But the reverse lookup says so for 141.138.141.253. I have reverted the change and only list host names for matching forward and reverse lookups. That seems to be more safe to me.
Any other feature requests?
MrSheep
-
Looks like it isn’t working, look at [url=http://pool2:19327/static/]http://pool2:19327/static/[/url] thats not gonna work :p
-
Yeah, that’s the backup pool for pool.maeh.org. As the script is currently running on that pool it does not add the domain name correctly. Fixed.
-
Nice! Now more people got to use p2pool :-\
-
If I look at the list it seems the p2pool network consist of just 10 really active nodes, is that true ?
It appears that i’m taking ‘care’ of almost 25% of the p2pool network capacity, we need some more hashing power here folks ! -
Yeah. It is a bit misleading as some pools that are still running the old version or on a different port (p2pool.org) are not in the list so far. But yes, we do need more active nodes and more hashing power. We started from 0 MH/s though…
-
I noticed, that some pools haven’t been seen for a couple of days.
After which time these pools are deleted?
A typical reason for a pool showing up only one day is, that he pool is using a DSL line and receives a new IP address every 24 hours.
-
Added that. Pools not answering for 1 hour are now being deleted from the list. They will be re-added once they’re active again and show up for the p2pool node (if they change ip address)
-
Is there any chance to determine what coin a pool is mining?
I cloned the p2pool-scanner from github to add an interactive pie chart, and my node-list shows
pool.ishtar.ca:19327, a pool, that is mining Dodge Coin. I tried to find something in the code for p2pool, but I
don’t know python and the code is too complex for my knowledge. -
So far i have not found an easy way to query that remotely…
-
I have added two url in the p2pool-feathercoin and send a pull request to https://github.com/andreasfaerber/p2pool-feathercoin/
if that will be included (by you??? ;) ) the url “/symbol” will return “FTC” and this could be used to determine the coin a pool is mining on.
the other one is /prefix" and returns the prefix defined in the networks.py of p2pool code
This is no short term solution, but at least it is a possible solution ;)
-
Morning,
Ok, merged that pull request and activated it on pool.maeh.org and pool2.maeh.org. Looks good so far…
Regards,
MrSheep -
I noticed, that some pools haven’t been seen for a couple of days.
After which time these pools are deleted?
A typical reason for a pool showing up only one day is, that he pool is using a DSL line and receives a new IP address every 24 hours.
i am on but not visible in list.
-
Can I get clarification on how nodes are added to the list? I have a public node that has been online for several months, but it is on a different port,19329. Does it have to be on port 19327? I see there are some others such as p2pool.org:9377 which isn’t on that same port so I’m just curious if these have to be added manually or not.
