Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    Feathercoin 0.8.6

    Technical Development
    9
    16
    6285
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      estrabd Regular Member last edited by

      Nice! Will you be tagging it 0.8.6 once you’re through with test?

      I’ll roll this up into a FreeBSD Port - though still no movement on the original Port getting into their repo, though. I’m pretty disappointed with their process atm.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • lizhi
        lizhi last edited by

        Nice! I am compilying it . How many lines of code 0.8.6 ?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Bushstar
          Bushstar last edited by

          Nice! Will you be tagging it 0.8.6 once you’re through with test?

          I’ll roll this up into a FreeBSD Port - though still no movement on the original Port getting into their repo, though. I’m pretty disappointed with their process atm.

          This will be tagged as 0.8.6. So far no problems have been reported.

          Nice! I am [background=#ffffff]compilying it . [/background][background=#ffffff]How many lines of code [/background][background=#ffffff]0.8.6 ?[/background]

          To see the code changes please go to GitHub and look at the commits on Feb 26.

          https://github.com/FeatherCoin/Feathercoin/commits/master-0.8.6?page=1

          Donate: 6hf9DF8H67ZEoW9KmPJez6BHh4XPNQSCZz

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wrapper
            wrapper Moderators last edited by

            I agree, looking at the changes, it is a good move forward.

            Cheers Peter! more Rep ++

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • MrWyrm
              MrWyrm administrators last edited by

              Is it just me, or is there a buzz around this place since the forum changed? Top work. ;D

              Like what I do: 6uuy6isbrW1SBF191Bzgui1gWxPdNKx2PB

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • U
                uncle_muddy administrators last edited by

                I’ll get a version down later, stuff it in a VM and have a play with it. Will try and get back to you over the weekend…

                UM

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • lizhi
                  lizhi last edited by

                  Coin Control : Correct !. I choice some ftc ,then pay to bter.com, Correct !

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrapper
                    wrapper Moderators last edited by

                    I noticed the compile error

                    /home/tony/Feathercoin/src/main.cpp:2323: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘int64 {aka long long int}’ [-Wformat=]

                    return error(“ProcessBlock() : block has a time stamp of %u before the last checkpoint of %u”, pblock->GetBlockTime(), pcheckpoint->nTime);

                    1. As this is Checking / checkpointing, and has the error integer missmatch. Just checking it is absolutley not a problem?

                    2. What is our position on moving to Qt5 compile?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Wellenreiter
                      Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                      No, that is no problem.

                      as the message says, it is a warning and means, that you give parameter of format in64 to a function that expects format unsigned int.

                      As both types are integer, there should be no problem.

                      Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                      Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • lizhi
                        lizhi last edited by

                        I compile it success with win7 32bit system.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • V
                          voingiappone Regular Member last edited by

                          Up and running!

                          Thanks for the heads up

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post