[Dev] Private Blockchain Addresses (Dark Blockchain)

[A Former User]

Yes, I have fixed the bugger.

[A Former User]

We need to start testing this… Testnet time?

[MrWyrm]

Count me in.

[lizhi]

We need to start testing this… Testnet time?

No, It is working on main_net. Some SX transactions have been confirmed.

List:

Block # 556535 (Mainchain)

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/137455e27de1c7b3302c3b0c462fb0d904a831339aebf468e6e85c224362f51b

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/ff6179824ddad55fe0666b2f7f7a25958d12644a5563f776ddfda7aeda20cf12

Block #566321 (Mainchain)

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/843cf93bebad1682b6385ba4c8b19f137d40d3f0808330b196057eaa6b445a98

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/85568ae1dacfdc6730b0d2ddeb2c4d7d07b0ac702e6d9a7f408293e2cd628d57

Block #569270 (Mainchain)

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/4305587958876434ba60af536a108f2adf2e99f3616b90ed8a1aec96b398817a

Block #582187 (Mainchain)

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/530c29dffffeb8fe24a8b03f4ccbef0adc7008f5bdfbb29c8a3cf6f9cdcaf9a7

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/1de36440571edf827920007704f9987389d1f9c7fe597377ae93c29508f70013

http://block.ftc-c.com/tx/d5005bb2cf68dbbdf23aa348742bf62e3056ab05bfc62f00a358b45c24e41a12

Block #556535,566321,569270,582187 make in my 0.9.3 core pool(pool.ftc-c.com). If my miners find a block, SX transactions will been confirmed.

[lizhi]

SX transactions all right ^-^ , we can send FTC with SX address, then we can receive those coins.

[kris_davison]

So do we just download the new wallet and starts testing it?

[kris_davison]

Is it possible to add support to the android wallet?

Not sure if that’s required. Buy would any changes be needed to the wallet to make it compatible?

[lizhi]

So do we just download the new wallet and starts testing it?

Yes. You can . download it at http://www.ftc-c.com/pack2/feathercoin-qt.rar

[A Former User]

Let the testing begin

[A Former User]

Ill report back tomorrow.

[mirrax]

Downloading the wallet!

[MrWyrm]

I think SX addresses are good for tipping addresses.

[A Former User]

If it could be built into a tipping function, that would be epic. No “return to sender” style.

[MrWyrm]

That’s how I see a ‘name server’ function working, not holding normal addresses but a SX address, so you don’t have have your ‘soft name’ tied to your live addresses.

Find user ‘mrwyrm’ in the wallet would be amazing.

[kris_davison]

thats what is said here aswell https://medium.com/@octskyward/ecdh-in-the-payment-protocol-cb2f81962c1b

that it would be better to have a community based address book that could be used for stealth tx

[MrWyrm]

Not sure if any of you are familiar with openname and onename. It uses namecoin. Very cool.

[A Former User]

Sounds like a worthy concept. Maybe we should create a place marker on Slack.com

[kris_davison]

done

[Tuck Fheman]

Wow, I had no clue this was going on. Nice job everyone!

[A Former User]

99% of the cryptosphere has no idea what is going on in the background…

Half the reason we ain’t doing so well in the market cap arena.

But this is just the start…

Can you say, “Decentralised cross crypto exchange built into the ftc blockchain”

I know I can :D