Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    Why is btc-e delisting of FTC actually good for FTC

    Feathercoin Discussion
    15
    22
    4680
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      Tuck Fheman last edited by

      fuck btc-e. they hate ftc and manipulated the price (allegedly).

      plus they banned me for like 3 months for jokingly linking to a cam girl on this forum that accepted ftc when asked in trollbox, “what can i do with ftc?” :P__

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • lizhi
        lizhi last edited by

        Let feathercoin do a new bridge coin.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          loneranger last edited by

          Feathercoin had a substantial advantage being on btc e over other coins. Lets see how they o on a level playing field :-)

          I think Feathercoin volume will be super low. It was low on btc e for gods sake

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MrWyrm
            MrWyrm administrators last edited by

            The weight of BTCe’s traders and the lack of decimal trades means that FTC lacked volatility.FTC has to jump 1000 satoshi on BTC-e to register on the graph.

            Like what I do: 6uuy6isbrW1SBF191Bzgui1gWxPdNKx2PB

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              RIPPEDDRAGON Regular Member last edited by

              The weight of BTCe’s traders and the lack of decimal trades means that FTC lacked volatility.FTC has to jump 1000 satoshi on BTC-e to register on the graph.

              Yep, exactly.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • AmDD
                AmDD Regular Member last edited by

                I made this comment in the other thread but ill throw it here as well. btc-e was nice because all 4 coins I am interested in were traded there (BTC, LTC, FTC, XPM). Now that FTC and XPM are being removed and that I dont buy anything in USD from there I really have no reason to continue using their site. It will be easier to trade on another exchange.

                I do agree that the news could be good for FTC. People may take notice again and see that it can be mined with a GPU.

                We shall see I guess…

                P2Pool Node: http://104.236.34.9:19327/ 0.5% fee

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  shadowhh32 Regular Member last edited by

                  45Khs/sec is your idea of GPU mining? While I agree it should be easier with a GPU on Neoscrypt this hardly seems rewarding for minig.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    Kevlar Spammer last edited by

                    45Khs/sec is your idea of GPU mining? While I agree it should be easier with a GPU on Neoscrypt this hardly seems rewarding for minig.

                    It’s not, it just crashed the market and hyper-inflation is now having it’s say.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User last edited by

                      The BTC-e delisting ended up hurting us pretty bad…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        Kevlar Spammer last edited by

                        1, FTC is topic of discussion again

                        2, Lot of zombie FTC community members wake up

                        3, FTC is locked in orderbook on btc-e, sell walls are just too big so moving to another exchange might actually allow price to rise.

                        The BTC-e delisting ended up hurting us pretty bad…

                        I’m not really surprised. While 1 and 2 may have been true, they’re in no way helpful at all, and 3 never stood a chance of happening I’m afraid.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          mirrax last edited by

                          I’m not really surprised. While 1 and 2 may have been true, they’re in no way helpful at all, and 3 never stood a chance of happening I’m afraid.

                          2 is definitely true as we have another fosil talking here :D

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User last edited by

                            Bump.

                            This wasn’t debated enough.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kelsey
                              kelsey last edited by

                              seriously u guys are just reaching…tis painfully obvious it was extremely bad for ftc.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                Kevlar Spammer last edited by

                                seriously u guys are just reaching…tis painfully obvious it was extremely bad for ftc.

                                Yes. We agree.

                                Now shall we discuss the reasons why? I could practically write a case study on the matter.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post