Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    "Safe Nodes?"

    Feathercoin Discussion
    4
    7
    1202
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      raptorak last edited by

      Hey guys, a pool owner is asking for a listing of safe nodes to help combat the orphans. Can you please post a public list as well, so other pool owners can add them and help us get out of this problem?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        Radacoin last edited by

        Would this help to mitigate the effects of the attacks?

        I mean can you limit the client/daemon to only connect to a list of specific nodes?

        If so, I’d be awesome to have a list of officially Feathercoin / Bushstar approved nodes.

        I’d be willing to participate and keep my node running 24/7.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • zerodrama
          zerodrama Regular Member last edited by

          Safe nodes won’t work. The attackers will end up with the longer chain and they will then own it all.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            Radacoin last edited by

            [quote name=“zerodrama” post=“12248” timestamp=“1370850965”]
            Safe nodes won’t work. The attackers will end up with the longer chain and they will then own it all.
            [/quote]

            Just some random thoughts: Instead of having the “longer chain” decide who’s right and who’s wrong, how about a trust system?

            So nodes get trust levels (after each successful transfer from LTC address A to LTC address B I can give node A good (or bad) rating. Those ratings are per LTC address and are propagated through the network.

            Newbie / attacker nodes would never have a chance to take over the network (because they have no good rating).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Mogumodz last edited by

              Bangs head on desk.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                Mogumodz last edited by

                [quote name=“erk” post=“12263” timestamp=“1370854120”]
                Releasing a checkpoint would be an idea.
                [/quote]

                Any checkpoints would help.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zerodrama
                  zerodrama Regular Member last edited by

                  [quote name=“Radacoin” post=“12254” timestamp=“1370852786”]
                  [quote author=zerodrama link=topic=1503.msg12248#msg12248 date=1370850965]
                  Safe nodes won’t work. The attackers will end up with the longer chain and they will then own it all.
                  [/quote]

                  Just some random thoughts: Instead of having the “longer chain” decide who’s right and who’s wrong, how about a trust system?

                  So nodes get trust levels (after each successful transfer from LTC address A to LTC address B I can give node A good (or bad) rating. Those ratings are per LTC address and are propagated through the network.

                  Newbie / attacker nodes would never have a chance to take over the network (because they have no good rating).
                  [/quote]

                  Ratings don’t work. Anyone who can attack like this can get fake ratings. Hell they can even make fake transactions sending from people with good ratings.

                  The only way to fix the 51% issue is to have multi stage confirmations so that only when all stages are complete do you get all the coins.

                  Complex is good, because everyone can participate. Complicated is not good, because only the big guns, the ones most likely to attack, can participate.

                  Participation is the answer.

                  Solutions that react will fail. Solutions which look ahead will succeed.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post