[Dev] Feathercoin 0.9.6.2 * Maintenance fix, build & upgrade issues notes.

wrapper

net.cpp - Line 1771

 if (fDebug)
    LogPrintf("StopNode()\n");

net.cpp - Line 1799

   if (fDebug)
       LogPrintf("DNS seeding disabled\n");

Util.h

Various thread start end messages

   { 
         if (fDebug)
    /        LogPrintf("%s thread start\n", name);
         func();
         if (fDebug)
              LogPrintf("%s thread exit\n", name);
     }
     catch (boost::thread_interrupted)
     {
          if (fDebug)
                LogPrintf("%s thread interrupt\n", name);

Code added

/src/qt/bitcoin.cpp

if (fDebug)
    LogPrintf("Requesting initialize\n");


if (f Debug)
   LogPrintf("Requesting shutdown\n");

if (fDebug)
   LogPrintf("Stopping thread\n");
emit stopThread();
coreThread->wait();
if (fDebug)
    LogPrintf("Stopped thread\n");

Code added

     {
         if (fDebug)
             LogPrintf("Running Shutdown in thread\n");
         threadGroup.interrupt_all();
         threadGroup.join_all();
         Shutdown();
         if (fDebug)
             LogPrintf("Shutdown finished\n");

Code added

    if (fDebug)
        LogPrintf("Running AppInit2 in thread\n");

Code added

if (fDebug)
    LogPrintf("init message: %s\n", message);

Code added

if (fDebug)
    LogPrint("qt", "GUI: %s\n", msg);

Code added

if (fDebug)
     LogPrint("qt", "GUI: %s\n", qPrintable(msg));

Code added

wrapper

Remaining Messages

2017-08-12 18:01:39 Receive checkpoint,hashCheckpoint=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
.ERROR: CSyncCheckpoint::CheckSignature() : verify signature failed
2017-08-12 18:02:05 UPNP_DeletePortMapping() returned : 0

net.cpp

        if (fDebug)
            LogPrintf("UPNP_DeletePortMapping() returned : %d\n", r);

Code added

        if(r != UPNPCOMMAND_SUCCESS)
            if (fDebug)
                 LogPrintf("UPnP: GetExternalIPAddress() returned %d\n", r);
        else

Code added

           else
                if (fDebug)
                    LogPrintf("UPnP: GetExternalIPAddress failed.\n");

Code added

            if(r!=UPNPCOMMAND_SUCCESS)
                if (fDebug)
                    LogPrintf("AddPortMapping(%s, %s, %s) failed with code %d (%s)\n",
                    port, port, lanaddr, r, strupnperror(r));

Code added

checkpointsync.cpp

if (!key.SetPubKey(ParseHex(strMasterPubKey)))
    {
    if (fDebug)
        LogPrintf("CSyncCheckpoint::CheckSignature() : SetPubKey failed");
    return true;
    }
if (!key.Verify(Hash(vchMsg.begin(), vchMsg.end()), vchSig))
    {
    if (fDebug)
        LogPrintf("CSyncCheckpoint::CheckSignature() : verify signature failed");
    return true;
    }

Code added

Wellenreiter

I’d keep the last one, as ACP checkpoint checksignature failed is relative important

wrapper

I’ve been through and added more, if (fDebug) (as opposed to just commenting them out) .

Most of the debug messages are still there, you just have to run -debug to see them. The checkpoint “error” did not seem to be a “Fault”, just a none complaint checkpoint.

wrapper

[FAQ] What is the difference between LogPrint() and LogPrintf() in the Feathercoin/Bitcoin source code?

Under normal conditions the LogPrintf() should only be used to report an unusual error, otherwise it is used during development to confirm an action and commented out for production versions.

Writing unnecessary messages to debug slows the system and takes up disk space. Whilst the debug can be shrunk, this relies on additional parameters being passed or set up at install time.

LogPrintf() statements log the output into debug.log file. LogPrint() statements only out put to the log file if -debug is set.

wrapper

main.h

 static const unsigned int DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_TRANSACTIONS = 100;
  /** Default for -maxorphanblocks, maximum number of orphan blocks kept in memory */
 -static const unsigned int DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_BLOCKS = 750;

 +static const unsigned int DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_BLOCKS = 7500;

  /** The maximum size of a blk?????.dat file (since 0.8) */

Increased Max orphans default to 7500.

Wellenreiter

@wrapper

too high. I’d try 1500.

There is a reason to limit the max number of orphan blocks

wrapper

@Wellenreiter said in [Dev] Feathercoin 0.9.6.2 * Maintenance fix, build & upgrade issues notes.:

@wrapper

too high. I’d try 1500.

There is a reason to limit the max number of orphan blocks

I’ve tested it at 10,000 and that is (7500) what Dogecoin raised it to. There is no point it being lower, it was set too low.

Wellenreiter

@wrapper it’s a security measure against (D)DOS attacks to the BC, so it will work even when set to 10000000, but may stall the BC, if someone injects a high number of orphans. I’m not sure how many orphans an attacker could create, but…

wrapper

From the sync tests, we know there are already > 6000 ORHAN BLOCKS chains in the Blockchain already…

wrapper

https://github.com/FeatherCoin/Feathercoin/pull/216

Debug.log io review - Resultant fixes / improvements:

A large number of debug messages were only useful in development and have been commented out.

A further large number of messages only indicate information in an error condition and have will now only write out if -debug is set.

A small number of error messages are alerted during sync, because they are on an orphan chain, that is correct (to have the error). Further errors may need investigating so they were changed to write on -debug.

Because the max ORPHAN BLOCKS in a chain exceeds the current temporary memory pool during sync, this caused stalling whilst the memory was reloaded. The memory can be increased with a switch -maxorphanblocks=10000 - This has been increased from 750 to 7500, as per Dogecoin fix, is being tested for sufficiency / memory issues.

A number of LogPrintf() messages were reviewed and considered useful error messages to write to Debug.log that may help support in unusual circumstances. These were left unchainged.

UTF-8 translations were backported from 0.11.2

The Feathercoin client is now starting and stopping without creating a debug.log. When Debug is initiated the information is more succinct and relevant. The synchronization time is very significantly improved.

wrapper

Remaining Messages no Debug:

2017-08-13 13:48:40 partner xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9336 using obsolete version 60002; disconnecting
2017-08-13 13:48:40 ProcessMessage(version, 102 bytes) FAILED
2017-08-13 14:00:00 ERROR: CAlert::CheckSignature() : verify signature failed
2017-08-13 14:00:51 ERROR: CheckBlockHeader() : block with timestamp before last checkpoint
2017-08-13 14:00:51 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
2017-08-13 14:00:51 ERROR: CheckBlockHeader() : block with timestamp before last checkpoint
2017-08-13 14:00:51 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED

Large block same message then :

2017-08-13 14:08:52 socket recv error Connection reset by peer (104)

~Block 1145437

src/main.cpp - Line 2835
2017-08-13 14:00:51 ERROR: CheckBlockHeader() : block with timestamp before last checkpoint

     if (deltaTime < 0)
       {
           return state.DoS(100, error("CheckBlockHeader() : block with timestamp before last checkpoint"),
         REJECT_CHECKPOINT, "time-too-old");

These are old rejected blocks, I assume, so not required on sync.

main.cpp - Updated code

     {
         if (fDebug)
              LogPrintf("CheckBlockHeader() : block with timestamp before last checkpoint");
         return state.DoS(100, NULL,
                          REJECT_CHECKPOINT, "time-too-old");
     }

Code added

main.cpp Line 3199

if (!CheckBlock(*pblock, state, INT_MAX)) 
	  return error("ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED");

Updated to :

if (!CheckBlock(*pblock, state, INT_MAX)) 
          if (fDebug)
              LogPrintf("ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED");
	  return true ;

netbase.cpp

Update with Bitcoin bug fix to correct (104) error

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4552
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/109849e204f91d8b04b0e57da87e45b461096b50

wrapper

Full sync from scratch Test, 0.9.6.2 in progress

So far : 2.5 years in 13 hours : 5 hrs P/Day. - estimate 20 hrs full sync time (~4pm).

Remaining Debug messages :

2017-08-13 18:12:10 socket recv error Connection reset by peer (104)
2017-08-13 18:25:03 socket recv error Connection timed out (110)

Recommendation :

The Debug.log testing has shown that a number of operation, which were envisioned as errors initially, have occurred in the blockchain. This has meant that certain settings, loop levels or error messages are repeated during re-syncronisation of the blockchain.

Where’as 0.11.2 version already contain some speed ups that effect Bitcoin, (secp256k1) the FTC block sync is considerably reduced, but at ~22 hrs (estimate), would still seem long.

ToDo.

Set up a script and chron job to pole feathercoin during a resync and write Blocknumber every minute. This will 1200 data points to identify any problem block chains. These may indicate further settings that can be tweaked.

 feathercoind getinfo >> StallTest.txt

Preliminary test show synchronization is running pretty consistently at :

BlocksPerHour
39750
BlocksPerMinute
662

Full sync took 29 Hours, with no special settings and 4 outputs to debug, about lost connections…

BlockSycTest

Get Block count was often delayed

BlockSycTest

Blocks per minute

BlockSycTest

Testable

-dbcache to a value around 4000

8 connections limitation

Give Higher CPU Priority to Bitcoin-Qt Process
The above approach of blockchain import should be faster than syncing the whole blockchain block by block. Give the process higher CPU priority might further help speeding up the blockchain import especially you have more CPU cycle at your disposal. If you’re using Mac OS X, and assuming the Process ID (PID) of Bitcoin-Qt is 2202, use the following command to give Bitcoin-Qt process hight CPU priority:

sudo renice -20 -p 2202

*-20 is the nice value a value between -20 and +19. The lower the nice value, the higher priority the process gets.

wrapper

Results of Sync Speed Tests

Found very interesting Result from Sync speed Tests :::::

The sync speed dropped from ~710 Blocks per minute to ~670 Blocks per minute

After the synchronsiation passed the Hard Fork for : One minute Blocks, Neoscrypt and eHRC additional calculations.

This is actually impressive as we are processing 2.5 times the amount of blocks and re-targeting every block! It indicates that Neoscrypt is efficient. Thanks @Ghostlander.

Although it might also be effected by other factors, such as the increasing number of transactions, it mean that it would be worthwhile to do the Neoscrypt update :

https://github.com/ghostlander/Phoenixcoin/commit/ddbdbf6cbff4ca52f87268f28c60d588bf843344

I suggest we test that in 0.9.6.2 as the best version / (none alpha) we have at the moment.

wrapper

Results of dbcache test

Comparison shows a slight improvement with dbcache set to 3000, particularly as glitch in initial test associated with dropout, or network effect.

It may be worth while to increase default to 1000 from 300, minor downside of disk space / memory.

dbcache set to 3000

wrapper

Test changing max outbound connections

Test upping default from lowly 8 to more reasonable 30

net.cpp

static const int MAX_OUTBOUND_CONNECTIONS = 30;

1st test : slower only maintained 3 connections.

Up from 125 to 200:
int nMaxConnections = 200;

Wellenreiter

@wrapper

It takes some time to build up more connections, I usually have 8 connections and after one or more hours it goes up to 10-12.
The explorer hosts maintain given or taken ~ 100 peers after some days being online

wrapper

LTC also recommends 1000MB max dbcache. Testing increase min from 4 to 10.

src/txdb.h

 // -dbcache default (MiB)
static const int64_t nDefaultDbCache = 100;
// max. -dbcache in (MiB)
static const int64_t nMaxDbCache = sizeof(void*) > 4 ? 4096 : 1024;
 // min. -dbcache in (MiB)
static const int64_t nMinDbCache = 4;

wrapper

stealth.cpp - 0.9.6.2

std::string CStealthAddress::Encoded() const
{
// https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet/Stealth#Address_format
// [version] [options] [scan_key] [N] ... [Nsigs] [prefix_length] ...

data_chunk raw;
raw.push_back(stealth_version_byte);

raw.push_back(options);

raw.insert(raw.end(), scan_pubkey.begin(), scan_pubkey.end());
raw.push_back(1); // number of spend pubkeys
raw.insert(raw.end(), spend_pubkey.begin(), spend_pubkey.end());
raw.push_back(0); // number of signatures
raw.push_back(0); // ?

AppendChecksum(raw);

return EncodeBase58(raw);
};

In this shadow coding why is raw.push_back(0); // ? called twice?

wrapper

[FAQ] How does the stealth keys work

stealth.cpp

int StealthSecret(ec_secret& secret, ec_point& pubkey, const ec_point& pkSpend, ec_secret& sharedSOut, ec_point& pkOut)
{
    /* 
send:
    secret = ephem_secret, pubkey = scan_pubkey

receive:
    secret = scan_secret, pubkey = ephem_pubkey
    c = H(dP)

Q = public scan key (EC point, 33 bytes)
d = private scan key (integer, 32 bytes)
R = public spend key
f = private spend key

Q = dG  // Single use private key
R = fG

Sender (has Q and R, not d or f):

P = eG

c = H(eQ) = H(dP)
R' = R + cG
    
Recipient gets R' and P
test 0 and infinity?
*/